Thorough analysis! Slide titles and analysis could be condensed. Hook needs to be provided. Split up the slides, there is too much information on one slide. Transitions needed as well. Need more visuals to make visual interest. We are curious about how this could connect to Greg Mortenson.
Susanne, Your presentation had lots of good information and was very detail-oriented. However, it was difficult to read due to the extensive wording on each slide. It seemed more like a paper that was turned into a presentation by bulleting each sentence. Would have made for a better presentation if it was more concise and to the point.
Shane and Wyatt say: Pros: There was a lot of information. You covered a lot within the slides. There was no arguing that you didn't know the topic and the info from the movie.
Cons: If it was supposed to be within the 5 minute limit, then it might have been a little long. The use of pictures could have been used more, but aside from that a very thorough presentation.
Thorough analysis! Slide titles and analysis could be condensed. Hook needs to be provided. Split up the slides, there is too much information on one slide. Transitions needed as well. Need more visuals to make visual interest. We are curious about how this could connect to Greg Mortenson.
ReplyDeleteSusanne,
ReplyDeleteYour presentation had lots of good information and was very detail-oriented. However, it was difficult to read due to the extensive wording on each slide. It seemed more like a paper that was turned into a presentation by bulleting each sentence. Would have made for a better presentation if it was more concise and to the point.
Ava & Moogie
Shane and Wyatt say:
ReplyDeletePros: There was a lot of information. You covered a lot within the slides. There was no arguing that you didn't know the topic and the info from the movie.
Cons: If it was supposed to be within the 5 minute limit, then it might have been a little long. The use of pictures could have been used more, but aside from that a very thorough presentation.